Federal Policy

Advocating for Public Health Care Systems

CAPH works closely with members of California’s congressional delegation to advance federal policies that support public health care systems and the communities they serve.

Medi-Cal Funding

Protecting Medi-Cal: Vital Health Coverage for Californians and Funding for California’s Public Health Systems

Medi-Cal, California’s Medicaid program, is a cornerstone of the state’s health care system, providing coverage to one in three residents. Through Medi-Cal, public health care systems serve 3.7 million Californian’s annually—comparable to the combined populations of Los Angeles and San Francisco—ensuring access to essential care for some of the state’s most underserved communities. 

Medi-Cal funding is critical to sustain this care, supporting preventive services, emergency treatment, mental health care, and specialized medical services for low-income individuals and families across California. 

However, proposed federal changes that would reduce state and provider funding and impose new requirements on enrollees threaten access to these essential services. If enacted, these cuts would lead to coverage reductions and place significant strain on California’s safety net, especially public health care systems, making it more difficult for millions to receive the care they depend on. 

Impact of Federal Cuts to Medi-Cal 

Proposed federal Medi-Cal cuts would be catastrophic, putting immense strain on the state’s public health care systems. 

Shrinking FMAP Support:  

Proposed reduction to the Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (FMAP) would lower the federal share of Medi-Cal, shifting more financial responsibility to states, counties, and public health care systems themselves, requiring either dramatic increases in state or local spending or in massive cuts to services, including layoffs. California’s public health care systems, which provide billions of dollars already in Medi-Cal matching funds on behalf of the state, would be disproportionately affected, putting access to essential care at risk and forcing reductions in essential services. 

Fundamental Restructuring of Medi-Cal: 

Proposals such as per capita caps and block grants would fundamentally restructure Medi-Cal, eliminating its entitlement structure and imposing strict funding limits. These constraints would compound over time, increasing financial pressure not only on the state, but also on public health care systems that contribute the non-federal share to draw down federal funds. Without the flexibility to adjust funding based on actual health care needs or public health emergencies, public health care systems could face deep reductions in key funding. Forcing them to scale back essential services or close their doors altogether, making it harder for Californians to access care.  

Protecting Key Medi-Cal Financing Tools: State Directed Payments, Provider Taxes, and the MCO Tax 

Medi-Cal has a long history of paying providers at rates below the actual cost of delivering care. To help address this problem, CMS allows states to establish provider taxes, MCO taxes and state directed payments (SDP’s).  These payments are essential Med-Cal payments that help expand access to care for patients and allow public health care systems and other providers who predominantly serve Medicaid patients to keep our doors open.  In many cases, state directed payments make up 50% or more of public health care system’s Medi-Cal revenue.  

Without this funding, California’s public health care systems will need to reduce services and staff, and potentially close. These impacts will be felt first by Medi-Cal patients but will ultimately ripple across entire communities that rely on these systems for emergency services, trauma care, and other essential health care infrastructure.  

 New Barriers and Bureaucratic Hurdles to Medi-Cal Enrollment: 

New federal requirements such as work mandates or additional paperwork, would create additional layers of bureaucracy and confusion for beneficiaries, which will result in millions of individuals across the country losing coverage.

Medicaid DSH

Public health care systems rely on more than $1 billion annually in federal Medi-Cal disproportionate share hospital (DSH) funding to help offset the costs of serving predominantly Medi-Cal and insured patients, given Medi-Cal’s low reimbursement rates. Looming reductions to DSH allotments, set to take effect on October 1, 2025, would significantly impact California’s public health care systems. While deeply concerning, these DSH cuts come amid even more concerning federal proposals that could further destabilize the safety net.  

Congress has previously recognized the harm these reductions could cause and has consistently delayed their implementation since they were first scheduled in 2014. CAPH urges Congress to permanently eliminate the Medi-Cal DSH reductions to ensure that public health care systems can continue their critical role in California’s health care safety net and provide high-quality, equitable care to all. 

CAPH is also actively seeking a legislative fix to ensure that Medi-Cal patients with third-party coverage can be included in the calculation of hospital specific DSH allotments, which include some of our most costly and complex Medi-Cal beneficiaries. Given the uncertainty of DSH and the constant threat of cuts,it is crucial that the methodology fully accounts for the patient populations public health care systems serve, and funding reflects real costs and care needs. 

Protecting the 340B Drug Pricing Program 

The 340B Drug Pricing Program is essential to public health care systems, enabling them to stretch limited resources and provide vital care to underserved communities. Established in 1992, the 340B Drug Pricing Program (340B) is a federal program that requires the pharmaceutical industry to provide drug discounts to safety net providers as a condition of participation in Medi-Cal. These critical drug discounts enable public health care systems to expand access to care and invest in needed services, including offering free vaccines, behavioral health and telehealth services, and increased medication access for uninsured patients. 

For California’s public health care systems, which serve a high volume of Medi-Cal patients and deliver substantial uncompensated and unreimbursed care, the 340B Program is essential to sustaining their mission. 

However, recent federal actions have introduced uncertainties that could impact the efficacy of the program. On April 15, 2025, President Trump issued an executive order directing the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to consider changes to the 340B Program and related drug payment policies.  

These proposals, if implemented, could significantly lower the benefit PHS receive through the 340B Program and further strain already narrow operating margins and add onerous new requirements that could impede care delivery efforts. 

CAPH remains committed to protecting the 340B Program to ensure that safety net providers can continue to access pharmaceuticals at a discounted rate. We are closely monitoring federal policy developments that could impact the program. 

0 M

Fast Facts

CA’s public health care systems serve over 3.7 Million patients each year.